Gen. Adel marina chief of military justice, that the accused Alaa Ahmed Seif al-Islam Abdel-Fattah was not presented to the investigator as an activist, but as the accused, and that he was denied an appeal by the defendant to continue his incarceration, having committed crimes punishable under the Penal Code, namely:
1 theft of a weapon owned by the armed forces.2 intentional sabotage of the funds and property owned by the armed forces. 3 Amomcin infringement on the staff and charged with public service (members of the armed forces).4 gathering and the use of force and violence against members of the armed forces.
And all of the inherent jurisdiction of courts-martial under articles V and VII of the Code of Military Justice, noting that the defendants in the case of Maspero not one of them accused Alaa Ahmed Seif al-Islam Abdel-Fattah, but there are other defendants, civilian and military, all equal before the law.
Gen. marina in an official statement to him on Thursday, to say that the right to a fair trial, is a constitutional right of each defendant, and that the independence of the judiciary is the essence of justice, which requires investigation to provide a suitable atmosphere for the judges to work freely, Valmhakq brought charges according to the evidence before it , and the judge sentenced the evidence on which reassured them, taking into account that the basic rights in the patent, unless it is proved with certainty the defendant's conviction, in accordance with procedures prescribed by law, with safeguards to ensure that all litigation.
And In this context, explained the marina, that Haglua functions eliminate the military and their peers in the judiciary and public prosecution, subject to the same terms and conditions contained in Article 38 of the Judiciary Law, in terms of academic qualifications and general appreciation winning it, and they are independent and not subject to any authority except that of the conscience and the law, not judge only what is fixed securities, and are independent as well as between the parties to the case and public opinion, it is not the parties to the proceedings but to submit to the judge's request or Abdiyoa defense, and if not satisfied with ruling the judge not to them but to challenge the methods set by law, and to ensure the independence of the judge about the exposure to influence him by third parties, the offense of Penal Code of these attempts, and decided her punishment articles (186 and 187), indicating that the practice of military justice to its competence and duty can not hold on to it or waived, because violation of that denial of justice criminalized the Penal Code, or trial at all to the owner saw or thought of as long as committed to the law and away from the libel .
ليست هناك تعليقات:
إرسال تعليق