If I were the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces I asked myself after all the recent developments, especially the first demonstration yesterday: Why turned Garven love and support from the people to the Council following his courageous during the Revolution to this situation strange and exotic?!.
I do not claim that all or a majority of the people against the policies of the Council, but has become part of the people against him, and the majority of the elite no longer trust it.
Is not fit to come out one of the Council to tell us that the majority of the people with me, and that if a referendum were to be won more than 80%.
To the owners of these views say that Mubarak had in mind in such a way, then that «the party couch» is not represented by an integral of the Egyptian people. Party of the sofa is true that the election battle, resolved to introduce a candidate to Parliament. But on major issues such as the Constitution should not be true or the only criterion is the numerical majority.
If I settled for what the military hypocrisy of some politicians who are asking the Council to stay in power, they do not represent the people, those who have worshiped Mubarak and swept him to the inevitable end.
Council will say that he does not intend to stay in power and we are ready to believe him, but the document revealed that the peaceful Articles IX and X royal door to stay in power even if from behind a screen.
If I went out to the military council was made clear to the people I tell them these are my goals and those are my intentions and I am committed to a timetable and a clear-cut and logical moving the real power of the Council to the elected government. But the problem is that the Council is good or bad faith, March ambiguity is building completely and open the field wide open for a lot of speculation, according to some statements Hosni Mubarak and his son, Jamal that there was no intention of inheritance, which turns out to lie completely and that the scheme had made considerable progress.
Should not rely on the junta to the demonstrations carried out by the chants against him is so unpopular views, or an agent or a foreign-driven agendas, it may be some of that is true but there are actually many are opposed to the policies and intentions ambiguous. For the benefit of the military council and the people of Egypt and that there should be an objective reading of the scene until the current draw lessons and lessons.
That this happens is the courage and not a particular defect that misses the Council, but the disadvantage that each defect back to the days of the deposed and doctoral degrees obtained in the «Anad» But before that we remember what happened to him.
Ayman al-Husseini
ليست هناك تعليقات:
إرسال تعليق